“If your library is not ‘unsafe’, it probably isn’t doing its job.”
“Did you ever hear anyone say ‘That work had better be banned because I might read it and it might be very damaging to me’?”– Joseph Henry Jackson
I have never seen the reason or intelligence in banning a book; in all honestly it may be one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard of. I’m disappointed that this year I missed banned books week because I always try to read a book that is banned or challenged during that week. I suppose that since I am in the process of reading Stephanie Meyer’s New Moon when I have the time it might count. I predict that eventually the idiots of this world will begin to protest and challenge that series too. After all, these are the people who want powerful books that mean something to be banned. As you can tell I am of the opinion that no book should ever be banned, regardless of its subject matter or ‘ideas’.
Most people who want a book banned have either not read the book, fear the book, do not understand the book, misread the book, find the book disagrees with their personal ideas or beliefs, are offended by the book, or some combination of those things. Case in point: the Harry Potter series. I am a huge fan of the books, and as an adult I probably get more out of it intellectually and philosophically than a younger reader, and let me tell you something about them. J.K. Rowling speaks on issues and ideas far beyong the ‘magic and witchcraft’ that many people fear; she writes about power, not just magical, and hope and fear. She writes about tolerance, loyalty, understanding, and true friendship. If people understood, truly understood, the books, then they would understand that and would not want to ban them. No book will teach your child to be a witch, so please get your head out of your ass for two seconds long enough to pay attention to what you are saying. No book will corrupt your child if you have raised them correctly. Holbrook Jackson once said “Fear of corrupting the mind of the younger generation is the loftiest form of cowardice.” He is right. Those who fear such corruption of the younger generation, merely fear the fact that a younger generation might well become smarter than their predecessors.
“To prohibit the reading of certain books is to declare the inhabitants to be either fools or slaves.” – Claude Adrien Helvetius
Fear should not dictate your choices, and neither should blind prejudice and ignorance. That goes for more than just who you speak to or what you say. It applies to what you read and allow your children to read. Am I saying that your five year old should get her hands on your smutty Danielle Steele novel? Absolutely not, there are books not suitable for certain ages. What I am saying is that you shouldn’t ban a book because it might offend someone or because it mentions something you don’t believe in. So a book mentions homosexuality and you aren’t gay, big deal. That doesn’t make a book something to be banned and swept off the shelves. No book should be banned, no idea squelched, no knowledge forbidden. “An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all.” Oscar Wilde was a brilliant writer, and I’m almost positive many would have his writings banned. But ideas must be powerful, and they must not be hidden. To ban a book is to say “You cannot think for yourself, or form your own ideas about what you read so I must do it for you.” And that, readers, is wrong.
“All of us can think of a book… that we hope none of our children or any other children have taken off the shelf. But if I have the right to remove that book from the shelf – that work I abhor – then you also have exactly the same right and so does everyone else. And then we have no books left on the shelf for any of us.” Katherine Paterson once said, and she is right. The shelves of books must remain full, so that we may read and thus grow. Each book that is removed deprives our children and our future of ideas and knowledge. And when all the books are gone we will live in a world like George Orwell’s 1984, where the Thought Police may get us. I always think back to Fahrenhiet 451 a book that I read in high school and remains on my shelf to remind me. Books are not for burning, and to burn them is to give up freedom we so desperately need.
And finally there is the chief stupidity of banning books. That is the fact that banning a book drives us to read it, if only to see why it was banned. This semester in my Adolescent Literature course have read The Catcher in the Rye, and I still do not see the logic in banning, nor the reason for doing so. I actively seek out a book if it is banned, out of natural curiosity and rebellion. Tell a child not to do something, and that child will do it. Mark Twain once said “Adam was but human – this explains it all. He did not want the apple for the apple’s sake, he wanted it only because it was forbidden. The mistake was in not forbidding the serpent; then he would have eaten the serpent.” As humans we can’t resist the things that are forbidden to us, we seek out what cannot have and are told we must not do; it is a part of our natures. To ban a book is to ask us to read it.
I know I quoted a fair few people, but they are smart folks who know what they were talking about. Banning books is stupid and wrong. To ban a book is to violate freedom and to treat a person as though they are not smart enough to think for themselves. In conclusion to this very long entry, I leave you with this thought. Read a banned book today, no matter what it is, and exercise your freedom to think for yourself.
Quote of the Day: “The books that the world calls immoral are the books that show the world its own shame.” Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray

Thoughts on my thoughts